Top Personal Injury Law Firms in Seattle

Seattle’s injury landscape reflects the city’s mix of dense downtown corridors, steep neighborhood grades, winter slick spots, construction zones, and high-speed connectors like I-5, I-90, and SR-99. Following a crash or incident, a police or incident report and medical records from local hospitals or clinics typically initiate the paper trail. Washington applies pure comparative fault, which means your recovery can be reduced by any share of responsibility attributed to you—insurers will probe visibility, speed, signal timing, footwear, or warning signs. Early evidence is crucial: scene photos and videos, witness names, medical documentation, and, where available, vehicle data or store cameras. Know your coverages and rights: PIP can fund treatment now; UM/UIM may apply if the other driver is uninsured or underinsured; and health plan or provider liens must be addressed to preserve net recovery. The general statute of limitations for most personal injury claims in Washington is three years. Claims that involve government entities add a required claim presentation and waiting period before suit—so timelines should be mapped on day one.

This guide spotlights seven Seattle-area firms with established personal-injury practices across motor-vehicle collisions, premises incidents, defective products, and serious injury matters. For each firm, you’ll see who they serve, how they execute on liability and damages, and what differentiates their communication and cadence—so you can compare approaches, not just advertising. In the conclusion, you’ll find a practical plan to move from shortlist to selection, including fee structures, documents, and a hiring checklist tailored to Seattle practice.

‍

Personal Injury Law Firms in Seattle

Looking for a personal injury lawyer in Seattle? This guide explains Washington-specific rules, what to do after an accident, and seven vetted firms to help you choose confidently.

1. Davis Law Group, P.S.

Visit Website
+1 206-775-7509
2101 4th Ave #1030, Seattle, WA 98121, United States

Davis Law Group runs a milestone-driven playbook aimed at keeping momentum in motor-vehicle, premises, and serious-injury matters. Intake starts with preservation letters and a coverage map, then locks down evidence that commonly decides value here: traffic or building camera footage, signal timing or maintenance records where relevant, and clear, time-stamped photos. On damages, the team synthesizes ER notes, imaging, and specialist records into a plain-English narrative tied to work capacity and daily-life limits; when appropriate, they add vocational or life-care analysis for future costs. Negotiations are time-boxed around comprehensive demand packages that connect mechanism, medicine, and cost, with defined windows for carrier responses and mediation targets. If liability is contested or non-economic harms are undervalued, they file suit and sequence discovery—targeted depositions and document requests focused on issues that actually move numbers—rather than letting the file idle. Communication is predictable, with scheduled updates and clear client tasks (consistent treatment, expense tracking, and wage verification), so leverage grows as the record matures.

• Early video and document preservation
• Cohesive medical and vocational narratives
• Defined timelines from demand to mediation

2. Bernard Law Group

Visit Website
‍+1 206-222-5232
900 Aurora Ave N STE 100, Seattle, WA 98109, United States

Bernard Law Group balances litigation readiness with practical settlement strategy. Early work reconstructs how and why the incident occurred—sightlines at intersections, headlight conspicuity in rain, flooring traction in slip cases—supported by witness outreach and available camera sources. Damages are framed around function and prognosis: range-of-motion limits, scarring, concussion symptoms, return-to-work plans, and likely future care, all grounded in provider notes. Negotiation submissions are full of evidence but easy to understand, leading to meaningful responses from adjusters and preparing for mediation when both sides have similar Where comparative-fault arguments arise (late yellow turns, blocked sightlines, tracked-in water), they counter with photos, diagrams, maintenance records, or weather data to anchor liability. If filing becomes necessary, discovery stays disciplined and impact-focused, with regular strategy check-ins so you understand range, timing, and trade-offs at every step.

• Evidence-driven fault reconstruction
• Function-focused damages documentation
• Strategic mediation; disciplined discovery

3. Peterson Wampold Rosato Feldman Luna

Visit Website
‍+1 206-624-6800
1001 4th Ave, Seattle, WA 98154, United States

Peterson Wampold Rosato Feldman Luna (PWRFL) is well suited to high-stakes and technically complex cases—serious roadway collisions, product defects, and medical-injury matters. Their teams are meticulous about liability theory and proof, building records that align statutes, standards, and facts without overreaching. On the medical side, they coordinate treating-provider records with specialists when warranted to explain prognosis, scarring, neurological symptoms, or long-term orthopedic limitations; when future costs matter, they bring structured, defensible estimates. Negotiations are organized and data-heavy but client-friendly, with summaries that explain why a number is reasonable and where the leverage sits. If litigation is required, you can expect tight discovery management, credible experts, and mediation timed for maximum effect once key information has surfaced. Communication emphasizes clarity—who is doing what, when, and why—and practical homework that improves the file’s credibility.

• Meticulous theory and evidence alignment
• Credible projections of future care needs
• Tight expert use; leverage-timed mediation

4. The Stritmatter Firm

Visit Website
‍+1 206-448-17773600 15th Ave W #300, Seattle, WA 98119, United States

The Stritmatter Firm focuses on complex personal-injury and wrongful-death cases, including product-liability and catastrophic-injury claims. They are methodical about fault analysis—roadway design factors, sightlines, signage, or product standards—and work to expand liability beyond a single actor when the facts support it. Damage narratives are comprehensive: coordinated records from orthopedics, neurology, and plastics, paired with economists or life-care planners where future needs or earning capacity are at issue. Negotiation materials are polished and persuasive, connecting the mechanism to medicine with clean visuals and timelines; when carriers resist, they pivot to suit with a disciplined discovery plan and credible expert presentation. Clients can expect scheduled strategy sessions, transparent staffing, and a realistic timeline calibrated to King County practice so momentum does not stall.

• Expert-informed reconstruction and causation
• Future-care and earning-capacity quantification
• Disciplined discovery; credible expert work

5. Elsner Law Firm

Visit Website
+1 206-447-1425
2130 Westlake Ave N #3, Seattle, WA 98109, United States

Elsner Law Firm offers hands-on access and tight file control across motor-vehicle and general injury matters. Intake prioritizes a clear liability snapshot—how the incident unfolded, what the property or driver should have done differently, and which policies might respond—followed by requests for reports, photos, and any available video. Their damages approach is straightforward and adjuster-friendly: treatment chronology, imaging highlights, provider opinions on restrictions, and documented wage loss, with attention to scarring and daily-life disruption. Negotiations proceed on set timelines; if valuation stalls or liability is disputed, they outline the costs and benefits of filing and keep discovery focused on issues that shift value rather than on broad, expensive fishing expeditions. Communication is candid and routine, with specific to-dos (treatment adherence, expense logs, symptom journaling) that improve claim credibility without overwhelming clients.

• Practical, evidence-first demand packages
• Clear timelines and predictable updates
• Focused discovery when litigation is needed

‍

How to Choose a Personal Injury Lawyer in Seattle

Move from shortlist → outreach → selection within a week. Book consults with two or three firms and brings a tight packet: report numbers, staged photos or video, names and contacts for witnesses, medical records and bills to date, wage-loss documentation, and details for PIP and UM/UIM. In each call, confirm conflicts, who will staff your case (partner strategy vs. associate execution), and a concrete 60–90-day plan that sequences preservation letters, record pulls, demand timing, expected insurer response windows, and mediation targets. Ask for two or three comparable Seattle matters and what moved outcomes—camera footage, expert opinions, or timing. Establish your preferred communication channel and cadence so you never have to chase updates.

Fees & cadence. Most Seattle personal-injury matters are handled on contingency (a percentage of the recovery), with case costs advanced and reimbursed from the settlement. Clarify percentage tiers, whether a cost retainer is requested, approval thresholds for expenses, and how often you’ll receive status summaries (biweekly during active negotiation, monthly otherwise).

Documents & process. Expect an engagement letter and HIPAA releases for medical records. Your lawyer should maintain a working case calendar with dates for preservation, records collection, demand issuance, insurer responses, mediation, and (if needed) litigation milestones. A practical diligence list includes police/incident reports, photos and video, medical records and bills, wage verification, and any telematics or store-camera footage. In premises claims at commercial sites, anticipate additional materials like maintenance logs or contractor agreements; for public-entity matters, plan for a claim presentation and added waiting period before filing suit. If litigation proceeds, discuss timelines, dispute-resolution forums (mediation, arbitration, trial), and preparation for depositions or independent medical exams.

Hiring Checklist

• Define your matter, budget, and timeline.
• Ask for 2–3 comparable matters and outcomes.
• Confirm team staffing, partner touch, and availability.
• Clarify the fee model, retainer, and billing cadence.
• Review a proposed diligence/closing plan and dates.
• Ensure conflict checks and communication cadence.
• Align on success metrics and next milestones.